IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 65

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File for Claim Construction Discovery and Filing Supplemental Joint Claim Construction Statement by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richardson, Michael)

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 65

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IP INNOVATION L.L.C. TECHNOLOGY LICENSING

AND
CORPORATION,

$ $
$

Plaintiffs,
v.

$

$ $ $
$ $

CASE NO. 2:07CV-503-LED

ruRY TRIAL REQUESTED

GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.

$

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY AND FILING SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

Plaintiffs IP Innovation L.L.C. and Technology Licensing Corporation ("Plaintiffs") and
Defendant Google Inc. ("Defendant") hereby submit this joint motion regarding the timing of the

deposition of Jock Mackinlay ("Mackinlay"), one of the named inventors on U.S. Patent No. 5,276,785. Claim construction discovery is currently scheduled to close on August 13,2009. On July

13,2009, the parties filed a Joint Claim Construction Statement, wherein they agreed to file

a

supplemental statement to incorporate additional testimony gained through inventor depositions

during claim construction discovery.
Google originally noticed Mr. Mackinlay's deposition for August
1

Oth,

and rescheduled it to

August 1lth in an attempt to accommodate a conflict of plaintifß' counsel. At the request of

plaintiffs' counsel, Google has agreed to depose Mr. Mackinlay on August 27,2009, which will
accommodate the schedules of Mr. Mackinlay and both parties.

USIDOCS 7256682v1

Dockets.Justia.com

This deposition date will not affect the Marhnanbriefrng or any other deadlines. It will allow Google to incorporate relevant testimony of Mr. Mackinlay into its opening Marlcrnanbrief
(due September 7,2009), and

will allow

the plaintiffs to do so in their reply.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant respectfully request that the Court allow (a) Mr. Mackinlay's deposition to be held on August 27,2009, after the currently scheduled close of claim
construction discovery; and (b) the parties to file a supplemental joint claim construction statement to incorporate testimony from Mr. Mackinlay's deposition after the deposition occurs and prior to the submission of Google' s opening Markrnan brief .

Dated: August 7,2009

Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ David J. Mahalek

Raymond P. Niro Joseph N. Hosteny Arthur A. Gasey Paul C. Gibbons Douglas M. Hall David J. Mahalek NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

T. John Ward Ward & Smith I 11 W. Tyler St. Longview, Texas 7560I Telephone: [phone] Toll Free [phone] Facsimile : (903) 7 57 -2323 Eric M. Albritton [e-mail] Attomey atLaw P.O. Box 2649 Longview, TX75606 Telephone: [phone] Facisimile: [phone]

USIDOCS '1256682v1

ArronNnys FoR Pr.alNrrrrs

AND

Couxrnn-Cunr

Dnrnxo¿,Nrs IP INxova.rroN L.L.C. .lNo Tncgxor.ocv LrcnNslNc ConroRATIoN Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 6,2009
By: David J. Reck

David J. Beck Texas Bar No. 00000070 [e-mail] Michael E. Richardson Texas Bar No. 24002838 mrichardson@brsfi rm. com BECK, RepoeN & SBcnesr, L.L.P. One Houston Center I22l McKinney St., Suite 4500 Houston, TX. 77010 (713) 9st-3700 (713) 9sI-3720 (Fax)

Mark G. Matuschak (admittedpro hac vice) Wnrr¿pn CurlpnPlcKERINcHalE AND DoRR LLP
60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 (617) s26-6000 (617) s26-s000 (Fax)
John M. Hintz(admitted pro hac vice) Victor F. Souto (admitted pro hac vice) Ross E. Firsenbaum (admittedpro hac vice) Wlr-rvr¡R Cuu.rRPlcrezuNc Halp nNn DonnLLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022

(2t2)230-8800

[phone] (Fax)
Elizabeth Rogers Brannen (admittedpro hac vice) Anna T. Lee (admittedpro hac vice) Wu.tvlBn Cuu,BnPtcrBRlNcHelp nNo Donn LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA94304 (6s0) 8s8-6042 (6s0) 8s8-6100 (Fax)

ArroRNavs FoR DnrnNolNT AND CouNrnn-Cl¡,nrl Pl¿,rNrmp Gooclr INc.

USIDOCS 7256ó82v1

CERTIF'ICATE OF' SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(aX3XA).

/s/ Michael E. Richardson Michael E. Richardson

USIDOCS 1256682v1