Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 193

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion to Compel by Software Rights Archive, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Lee)

Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 193

IN T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

§ § Plaintiff, § § ~ § § G O O G L E INC., YAHOO! INC., § l A C S E A R C H & M E D I A , INC., A O L L L C , § a n d L YCOS, INC. § § Defendants. §
SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC

Civil A c t i o n No. 2:07-cv-511-CE

J U R Y T R I A L DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS Plaintiff Software Rights Archive, LLC ("SRA") respectfully moves this Court to extend its page limit for its Motion to Compel and also Google's page limit for its response thereto. In support o f this request, SRA states as follows: The Local Rules o f this Court limit S R A ' s Motion to Compel to 15 pages. S R A ' s motion presents multiple discovery disputes, however, spanning a nearly two-year time frame. These disputes share a common chronology, and it would be more efficient to present them in a single motion than to present them in multiple piecemeal motions. SRA therefore requests this Court to extend its page limit for this motion to 25 pages. Defendant Google does not oppose this motion, though it does oppose the propriety o f S R A ' s Motion to Compel. SRA and Google agree that, i f SRA is granted this extension o f page limit, Google likewise should be accorded an extension o f the page limit for its response to 25 pages. WHEREFORE, SRA respectfully requests this Court to extend the page limit for its Motion to Compel, as well as the page limit for Google's response, to 25 pages, excluding attachments.

Dockets.Justia.com

Respectfully submitted,

Lee~~a~t~ ~:-....-._---LEAD ATTORNEY

State B a r N o . 1 1 0 9 4 4 0 0
SMYSER KAPLAN & VESELKA, L . L . P .

700 Louisiana, Suite 2300 Houston, T e x a s 77002 [phone] (713) 2 2 1 - 2 3 2 0 ( f a x ) [e-mail] Victor G. Hardy S t a t e B a r N o . 00790821 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Andrew G. DiNovo State B a r N o . 0 0 7 9 0 5 9 4 Adam G. Price State B a r No. 2 4 0 2 7 7 5 0 Jay D. Ellwanger State B a r No. 2 4 0 3 6 5 2 2 DINovo PRICE ELLWANGER IlARnY LLP 7000 N o r t h M o P a c E x p r e s s w a y Suite 350 Austin, Texas 78731 (512) 6 8 1 - 4 0 6 0 (512) 6 2 8 - 3 4 1 0 ( f a x ) [e-mail]
Ofcounsel:

S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 Elizabeth L. DeRieux State B a r No. 05770585
CAPSHAW D E R I E U X

1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 Longview, T X 7 5 6 0 6 - 3 9 9 9 [phone] [phone] (fax) [e-mail]

Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 Robert C. Bunt State B a r N o . 00787165 Charles A i n s w o r t h State Bar No. 0078352
PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.

100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, T e x a s 7 5 7 0 2 [phone] [phone] (fax)

C E R T I F I C A T E OF C O N F E R E N C E
I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t S R A c o n f e r r e d w i t h G o o g l e ' s c o u n s e l r e g a r d i n g t h i s motion. G o o g l e does not oppose S R A ' s request for an extension o f the page limit for its motion to compel to 25 pages, subject to S R A ' s agreement (which SRA gives) to an extension o f Google's page limit for its response to 25 pages.

~::::::::====----------

C E R T I F I C A T E OF S E R V I C E
I hereby certify that all counsel o f record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy o f this document via the C o u r t ' s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 10, 2009.