Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 214

MOTION Extend page limits re 213 Response to Motion, by Software Rights Archive, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Lee)

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 214 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC § ~§ § Plaintiff, § § GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., § lAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL LLC, § § § Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) and LYCOS, INC. § Defendants. § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FOR CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING REGARDING DEFENDANTS' INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Before the Court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Extend Page Limits for Consolidated Briefing Regarding Defendants' Invalidity Contentions. Based on the arguments contained therein, and Defendants' non-opposition to the motion, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall have a page limit of twenty- five pages for its consolidated Response to Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Invalidity Contentions / Plaintiff s Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions. 2. Defendants shall have a page limit of thirty pages for their consolidated Reply Supporting Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Invalidity Contentions / Response to Plaintiff s Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions. 3. Plaintiff shall have a page limit of fifteen pages for its consolidated Sur-Reply to Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Invalidity Contentions / Reply Supporting Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?