Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 20

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Patton, Nicholas)

Download PDF
Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PAID SEARCH ENGINGE TOOL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § No. 2:08cv61 JURY DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT COMES NOW Defendant, Google, Inc., and files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement and would show the Court the following: 1. Defendant Google was served with a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement on May 28, 2008. The current deadline for Defendant Google to file its answer is June 17, 2008. 2. Defendant Google respectfully requests the Court extend the date on which it must file its answer or other responsive pleading to July 17, 2008. 3. Counsel for Defendant Google has conferred with opposing counsel and there is no opposition to this Motion. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant respectfully requests the Court grant its motion. Dockets.Justia.com Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Nicholas H. Patton Nicholas H. Patton SBN: 15631000 PATTON, TIDWELL & SCHROEDER, LLP 4605 Texas Boulevard P. O. Box 5398 Texarkana, Texas 7550505398 (903) 792-7080 (903) 792-8233 (fax) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 4th day of June, 2008. /s/ Nicholas H. Patton Nicholas H. Patton 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?