Actus, LLC v. Bank of America Corp. et al

Filing 182

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 174 Amended Complaint by Inc. Wal-Mart Stores. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ACTUS, LLC Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORP., ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CA No. 2:09-cv-102-TJW DEFENDANT WAL-MART STORES, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT COMES NOW Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, and files this unopposed motion for extension of time in which to answer Plaintiff Actus, LLC's Second Amended Complaint and would respectfully show the Court as follows: Wal-Mart has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to a further 21-day extension of WalMart's time to answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Specifically, Wal-Mart requests, and Plaintiff does not oppose, an extension of time up to and including September 28, 2009. A proposed Order granting this unopposed motion is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, _________________________________ Michael C. Smith State Bar No. 18650410 Siebman, Reynolds, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP 713 South Washington Avenue Marshall, Texas 75670 Office: (903) 938-8900 (Fax): (972) 767-4620 michaelsmith@siebman.com COUNSEL FOR WAL-MART STORES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) this the 4TH day of September, 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. ______________________________________ Michael C. Smith

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?