API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 163

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File (P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 Disclosures) by API Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saxon, Adam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION API TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. (1) FACEBOOK, INC.; (2) AMAZON.COM, INC.; (3) AMAZON WEB SERVICES LLC; (4) AOL LLC; (5) MAPQUEST, INC.; (6) BEBO, INC.; (7) TRUVEO, INC.; (8) BEST BUY CO. INC.; (9) CBS CORPORATION; (10) CBS INTERACTIVE INC.; (11) CBS INTERACTIVE MEDIA, INC.; (12) CNET INVESTMENTS, INC.; (13) CNET NETWORKS, INC.; (14) LAST.FM LIMITED; (15) THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION; (16) HOOVER'S, INC.; (17) GOOGLE INC.; (18) ANDROID, INC.; (19) THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION; (20) THOMSON REUTERS PLC; (21) THOMSON REUTERS U.S. INC.; (22) THOMSON REUTERS USA INC.; (23) REUTERS AMERICA, LLC; and (24) YAHOO! INC., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-00147 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal LEGAL02/31811263v1 With Prejudice of all claims and counterclaims asserted between plaintiff, API Technologies, LLC, and defendants, The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Hoover's Inc., in this case, and the Court being of the opinion that said motion should be GRANTED, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit between plaintiff, API Technologies, LLC, and defendants, The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Hoover's Inc, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys' fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. SIGNED this 16th day of March, 2010. __________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2LEGAL02/31811263v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?