API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 72

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by Thomson Reuters Corporation, Thomson Reuters PLC, Thomson Reuters U.S., Thomson Reuters U.S.A. Inc., Reuters America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ryan, Christopher)

Download PDF
API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al Doc. 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION API TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00147 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants Thomson Reuters Corporation; Thomson Reuters PLC; Thomson Reuters U.S. Inc.; Thomson Reuters U.S.A. Inc.; and Reuters America, LLC (collectively "Reuters") respectfully request an extension of time up to and including August 14, 2009 to answer Plaintiff API Technologies, LLC's Original Complaint. Plaintiff has advised that it does not oppose the extension. July 10, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Christopher V. Ryan Christopher V. Ryan (TX Bar No. 24037412) VINSON & ELKINS LLP The Terrace 7 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746-7568 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 236-3291 cryan@velaw.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION; THOMSON REUTERS PLC; THOMSON REUTERS U.S. INC.; THOMSON REUTERS U.S.A. INC.; AND REUTERS AMERICA, LLC Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email and/or fax, on this the 10th day of July, 2008. /s/ Christopher V. Ryan Christopher V. Ryan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?