Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Careerbuilder, LLC et al

Filing 26

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 13 Amended Complaint, by Digg, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bartow, D.)

Download PDF
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Careerbuilder, LLC et al Doc. 26 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC., a Delaware corporation; DIGG, INC., a Delaware corporation; DISNEY ONLINE, a California corporation; THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; EBAUM'S WORLD, INC., a New York corporation; FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation; IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company; NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a New York corporation; and YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DIGG, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC.'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant Digg, Inc., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion to extend its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Beneficial Innovations, Inc.'s Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement until and through November 4, 2009. Such motion is GRANTED. Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-175-TJW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED LIBA/1818076.1 It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Digg, Inc. has until and through November 4, 2009 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Beneficial Innovation's Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. LIBA/1818076.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?