Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 55

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control Order and Discovery Order by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)

Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Doc. 55

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE, INC., NOKIA, INC. and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00364-TJW-CE

JURY

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDERS Plaintiff, Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC and Defendants, A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc. file this Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Submit Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Orders by one (1) week and respectfully show the Court the following: The parties' current deadline to submit their proposed docket control and discovery orders to the Court is March 9, 2011, pursuant to the Court's Order of March 3, 2011. (Case No. 2:10-cv-364, Dkt. 54) The parties request a one (1) week extension of time up to and including March 16, 2011 to submit their proposed scheduling and discovery orders. The parties request this extension not for purposes of delay, but to allow the parties to additional time to meet and confer on a proposed schedule and discovery order.

1

Dockets.Justia.com

Dated: March 9, 2011

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 THE DAVIS FIRM P.C. 111 W. Tyler St. Longview, TX 75601 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Of Counsel Cameron H. Tousi David M. Farnum Ralph P. Albrecht ALBRECHT TOUSI & FARNUM PLLC 1701 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Ste 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC

/s/ Michael C. Smith Michael C. Smith Texas State Bar No. 18650410 SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP P.O. Box 1556 Marshall, TX 75671-1556 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 972.767.4620 E-mail: [e-mail] James F. Valentine (pro hac vice) Daniel T. Shvodian (pro hac vice) HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.798.3600 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS A9.COM, INC. AND AMAZON.COM, INC. /s/ Michael C. Smith Michael C. Smith Texas State Bar No. 18650410 SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP P.O. Box 1556 Marshall, TX 75671-1556 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 972.767.4620 E-mail: [e-mail] James F. Valentine (pro hac vice) Daniel T. Shvodian (pro hac vice) HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: 650.798.3600 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. /s/ Michael C. Smith Michael C. Smith Texas State Bar No. 18650410 SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP P.O. Box 1556 Marshall, TX 75671-1556 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 972.767.4620 E-mail: [e-mail] Robert F. Perry (pro hac vice) Allison H. Altersohn (pro hac vice) KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212.556.2222 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NOKIA INC. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 18650410 Allen Franklin Gardner POTTER MINTON P.C. 110 N. College Suite 500 P.O. Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 903.593.0846 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] 3

Mark D. Rowland (pro hac vice) ROPES & GRAY 1900 University Avenue 6th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.566.4144 E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 9th day of March, 2011. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III

4