Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 65

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 62 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)

Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Doc. 65

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE, INC., NOKIA, INC. and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00364-TJW-CE

JURY

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC ("WRT") and files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendants A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc.'s ("collectively defendants") Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and in support thereof would state as follows: Defendants filed their Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 23, 2011. (Dkt. 62) WRT's Response is currently due on Monday, April 11, 2011. WRT respectfully request an additional fourteen (14) days to file its Response to the Motion to Transfer up to and including April 25, 2011. Counsel for WRT conferred with counsel for Defendants and Defendants do not oppose the relief requested herein.

1
Dockets.Justia.com

Dated: April 5, 2011

Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 The Davis Firm, P.C. 111 W. Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Of Counsel Cameron H. Tousi David M. Farnum Ralph P. Albrecht Albrecht Tousi & Farnum, PLLC 1701 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Ste 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 5th day of April, 2011. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned certifies that counsel has complied with the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h), and that this motion is unopposed. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III

3