Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al

Filing 90

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Protective Order by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., GOOGLE, INC., NOKIA, INC. and RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § C.A. No. 2:10-cv-00364-TJW-CE JURY UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PROTECTIVE ORDER COMES NOW, Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC (“WRT”) with the consent and agreement of all parties and hereby files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Protective Order. Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 89) dated July 7, 2011, parties are to submit a proposed protective order to the Court by July 21, 2011. The Parties respectfully request an additional two (2) week extension to file their proposed protective order up to and including Thursday, August 4, 2011. Counsel for WRT conferred with counsel for Defendants and Defendants agree to the relief requested herein. Dated: July 21, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 The Davis Firm, P.C. 111 W. Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: (903) 230-9090 Facsimile: (903) 230-9661 E-mail: bdavis@bdavisfirm.com Of Counsel Cameron H. Tousi David M. Farnum Ralph P. Albrecht Albrecht Tousi & Farnum, PLLC 1701 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Ste 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 349-1490 Facsimile: (202) 318-8788 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT WIRELESS RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGIES LLC 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 21st day of July, 2011. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned certifies that counsel has complied with the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h), and that this motion is unopposed. /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?