Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al
Filing
97
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 94 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc.,, Nokia, Inc., Ricoh Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.,
GOOGLE INC., NOKIA, INC., and
RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC.,
Defendants.
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NOKIA CORPORATION and RICOH
COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendants.
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.,
GOOGLE INC., NOKIA, INC., and
RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 2:10-CV-00364-TJW-CE
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 2:10-CV-00365-TJW
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 2:10-CV-00577-TJW
WIRELESS RECOGNITION
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NOKIA CORPORATION and RICOH
COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 2:10-CV-00578-TJW
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
COMES NOW, Defendants A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google Inc., Nokia, Inc.,
Ricoh Innovations, Inc., Nokia Corporation, and Ricoh Company, Ltd. and file this Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC’s
Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule CV42(b), and in support thereof would state as follows:
Plaintiff filed its Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a)
and Local Rule CV-42(b) on August 16, 2011. (Dkt. Nos. 94 (2:10-cv-364), 23 (2:10-cv-365),
38 (2:10-cv-577), and 25 (2:10-cv-578).) Defendants’ Response is currently due on Friday,
September 2, 2011. Defendants respectfully request an additional fourteen (14) days to file their
Response to the Motion to Consolidate up to and including September 16, 2011.
Counsel for Defendants have conferred with counsel for Plaintiff and Plaintiff does not
oppose the relief requested herein.
-2-
Dated: September 2, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Michael C. Smith
Michael C. Smith
michaelsmith@siebman.com
Texas State Bar No. 18650410
SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP
P.O. Box 1556
Marshall, TX 75671-1556
Telephone: 903.938.8900
Facsimile: 972.767.4620
James F. Valentine (admitted pro hac vice)
JValentine@perkinscoie.com
California State Bar No. 149269
Daniel T. Shvodian (admitted pro hac vice)
DShvodian@perkinscoie.com
California State Bar No. 184576
Perkins Coie LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: 650.838.4300
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants
A9.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., and
GOOGLE INC.
-3-
/s/ Michael C. Smith
Michael C. Smith
michaelsmith@siebman.com
Texas State Bar No. 18650410
SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP
P.O. Box 1556
Marshall, TX 75671-1556
Telephone: 903.938.8900
Facsimile: 972.767.4620
Robert F. Perry (admitted pro hac vice)
Allison H. Altersohn (admitted pro hac vice)
KING & SPALDING LLP
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: 212.556.2100
Facsimile: 212.556.2222
E-mail: rperry@kslaw.com
E-mail: aaltersohn@kslaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
NOKIA INC. and NOKIA CORPORATION
-4-
/s/ Michael E. Jones
Michael E. Jones
Texas State Bar No. 18650410
Allen Franklin Gardner
POTTER MINTON P.C.
110 N. College, Suite 500
P.O. Box 359
Tyler, TX 75710-0359
Telephone: 903.597.8311
Facsimile: 903.593.0846
E-mail: mikejones@potterminton.com
E-mail: allengardner@potterminton.com
Mark D. Rowland (admitted pro hac vice)
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
Telephone: 650.617.4016
Facsimile: 650.566.4144
Email: mark.rowland@ropesgray.com
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
RICOH INNOVATIONS, INC. and RICOH
COMPANY, LTD.
-5-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are
deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have
consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by
email, on this 2nd day of September, 2011.
/s/ Michael C. Smith
Michael C. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?