Lodsys, LLC v. Combay, Inc. et al

Filing 31

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 30 Sealed Response to Motion.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration in Support of Opposition, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Huck, Christopher)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
LODSYS, LLC,

§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
v.
§
§
ATARI INTERACTIVE, INC.;
§
COMBAY, INC.;
§
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.;
§
ICONFACTORY, INC.;
§
ILLUSION LABS AB;
§
MICHAEL G. KARR D/B/A SHOVELMATE; §
QUICKOFFICE, INC.;
§
ROVIO MOBILE LTD.;
§
RICHARD SHINDERMAN;
§
SQUARE ENIX LTD.;
§
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, §
INC.,
§
§
Defendants.
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-272

ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS TO
PLAINTIFF LODSYS, LLC’S
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO
INTERVENE

Plaintiff Lodsys, LLC (“Lodsys”) respectfully submits the following additional
attachments to Lodsys’s unredacted Response In Opposition To Apple Inc.’s Motion To
Intervene [dkt. no. 30], which Lodsys filed under seal pursuant to this Court’s June 21, 2011
Order Granting Apple Inc.’s Motion For Leave To File Under Seal Exhibit A To the Declaration
Of Jonathan C. Sanders In Support Of Apple Inc.’s Motion To Intervene [dkt. no. 12].
The additional attachments are as follows: Declaration of Christopher M. Huck (with
exhibits), and a proposed order.

These documents were also filed as attachments to Lodsys’s

redacted Response In Opposition To Apple Inc.’s Motion To Intervene [dkt. no. 29].
Dated: July 28, 2011.

Respectfully Submitted,
By:

/s/ Christopher M. Huck
Michael A. Goldfarb
(admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Huck
(admitted pro hac vice)

KELLEY, DONION, GILL,
HUCK & GOLDFARB, PLLC
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6800
Seattle, Washington 98104
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
William E. “Bo” Davis, III
Texas State Bar No. 24047416
THE DAVIS FIRM, PC
111 West Tyler Street
Longview, Texas 75601
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lodsys, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this response was served on all counsel who are
deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(V). Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have
consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by
email, on this the 28th day of July 2011.
By:

/s/ Christopher M. Huck
Christopher M. Huck