Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc

Filing 100

Opposed MOTION to Strike 97 Response in Opposition to Motion, for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief in Response to Google's Motion to Transfer, and, in the Alternative, Cross-Motion to Stay Case Pending Resolution of Google's Transfer Motion by NetStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. Responses due by 7/10/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Strike Dkt. No. 97, # 2 Affidavit of Amanda K. Bonn in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Strike Dkt. No. 97, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4)(Bonn, Amanda)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION

ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES
LLC,
Plaintiffs,

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-893

v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO STRIKE
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Strike Under Local Rule CV-7(a)
Google Inc.’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief in Resonse
to Google’s Motion to Transfer and, in the Alternative, Cross-Motion to Stay Case Pending
Resolution of Google’s Transfer Motion (Dkt. No. 97). Local Rule CV-7(a) requires that “[e]ach
pleading, motion or response to a motion must be filed as a separate document . . . .” L.R. CV7(a). Google’s combined Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave and Cross-Motion to Stay is
therefore improper, as any Motion to Stay should have been filed as a separate document.
Good cause therefore appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion.

Google’s

Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief in Resonse to Google’s
Motion to Transfer and, in the Alternative, Cross-Motion to Stay Case Pending Resolution of
Google’s Transfer Motion (Dkt. No. 97) is hereby STRICKEN.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to
electronic service are being served this 26th day of June, 2014 with a copy of this document via
the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CD-5(a)(3).

/s/ Amanda K. Bonn