Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc

Filing 117

MOTION to Strike Defendant Google Inc.'s Deficient Obviousness Disclosure Under Patent Rule 3-3(B) by NetStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of John Lahad, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Lahad, John)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-893 v. GOOGLE INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. DECLARATION OF JOHN P. LAHAD IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT GOOGLE’S INC.’S DEFICIENT OBVIOUSNESS DISCLOSURE UNDER PATENT RULE 3-3(B) I, John P. Lahad, declare as follows: 1. I am a member in good standing of the Texas State Bar. 2. I am an attorney at the law firm of Susman Godfrey L.L.P., and I am counsel of record for Plaintiffs Rockstar Consortium US LP and NetStar Technologies LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) in this action. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant Google Inc.’s Deficient Obviousness Disclosure Under Patent Rule 3-3(b). 3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Exhibit B to Google’s Invalidity Contentions, served on May 23, 2014. 4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Google (Roberts) to counsel for Plaintiffs (Nelson and Lahad) dated June 23, 2014. 3252808v1/013149 5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Plaintiffs (Lahad) to counsel for Defendant (Roberts) dated June 25, 2014. 6. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of an email exchange between counsel for Google (Yang) and counsel for Plaintiffs (Lahad) dated July 2 to July 3, 2014. 7. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of an email from counsel for Google (Yang) to counsel for Plaintiffs (Lahad) dated July 18, 2014. 8. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an email from counsel for Plaintiffs (Lahad) to counsel for Google (Yang) dated July 21, 2014. 9. Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Google (Yang) to counsel for Plaintiffs (Lahad) dated June 30, 2014. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this 23rd day of July, 2014, at Houston, Texas /s/ John P. Lahad John P. Lahad CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this 23rd day of July, 2014 with a copy of this document and Exhibits 1-4 hereto via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CD-5(a)(3). /s/ John P. Lahad John P. Lahad 2 3252808v1/013149

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?