Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc
Filing
142
SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 117 MOTION to Strike Defendant Google Inc.'s Deficient Obviousness Disclosure Under Patent Rule 3-3(B) filed by Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lance Yang, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Perlson, David)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC.
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00893-RG
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DECLARATION OF LANCE YANG IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.’S SUR-REPLY
IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE GOOGLE INC.’S
OBVIOUSNESS DISCLOSURE UNDER PATENT RULE 3-3(b)
I, Lance Yang, declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney at the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) in this matter. I have personal knowledge of the
facts stated herein and if called to testify could and would competently testify thereto.
2.
Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email correspondence
between Lance Yang of Quinn Emanuel and John Lahad of Susman Godfrey.
3.
Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an excerpt of Exhibit B to
Google’s May 23, 2014 Invalidity Contentions..
4.
Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of an email correspondence
between Lance Yang of Quinn Emanuel and John Lahad of Susman Godfrey.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed September 4, 2014 in Los Angeles, California.
___________________________________________
Lance Yang
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?