Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Google Inc

Filing 144

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 122 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions by Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perlson, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP AND NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-00893-RG GOOGLE INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ PATENT RULE 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS Defendant Google Inc. files this unopposed motion for an extension of time for the following: • To file Google’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions (Dkt. No. 122) up to and including September 11, 2014, which is a three day extension from the current due date of September 8, 2014. Google has conferred with Plaintiffs, who do not oppose this motion. This extension is not for the purpose of delay but rather to properly respond to Rockstar’s Opposition. 1 /s/ David A. Perlson James Mark Mann Andy Tindel Gregory Blake Thompson Mann Tindel & Thompson 300 W. Main Henderson, TX 75652 903-657-8540 Charles K. Verhoeven David A. Perlson Sean Pak Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-875-6600 Robert Wilson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 212-849-7145 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served via electronic mail with a copy of this document on September 6, 2014. /s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts Andrea Pallios Roberts QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?