ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Amazon.com Inc., Apple, Inc., BlackBerry Corporation (f/k/a Research In Motion Corporation), Huawei Device USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4447766.), filed by ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baxter, Samuel)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple Inc.; BlackBery Corporation (fka Research
In Motion Corporation); Huawei Device USA, Inc.; and Motorola
Mobility LLC
King County, WA
(b)
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
(c)
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
(If Known)
(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)
Samuel F. Baxter -- McKool Smith P.C.
104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
Marshall, TX 75670
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only)
PTF
and One Box for Defendant)
PTF
DEF
DEF
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
or
and
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
CONTRACT
TORTS
PERSONAL INJURY
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
BANKRUPTCY
PERSONAL INJURY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
LABOR
SOCIAL SECURITY
PERSONAL PROPERTY
REAL PROPERTY
CIVIL RIGHTS
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
FEDERAL TAX SUITS
IMMIGRATION
Other:
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
(specify)
(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281-285
Patent infringement action
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY
12/18/2013
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CLASS ACTION
DEMAND $
JURY DEMAND:
(See instructions):
/s/ Sam Baxter
OTHER STATUTES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?