AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 155

***DUPLICATE OF 153 . PLEASE DISREGARD***RESPONSE in Opposition re 141 MOTION for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed by AdvanceMe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Matz, Robert) Modified on 11/20/2006 (mjc).

Download PDF
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC Doc. 155 Att. 1 Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 155 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, v. RAPIDPAY LLC, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC, and FAST TRANSACT, INC. d/b/a SIMPLE CASH, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:05-CV-424 (LED (JDL) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' EXPEDITED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS On this day, the Court considered Defendants First Funds LLC, Merchant Money Tree, Inc., and Reach Financial, LLC's Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend their Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. After careful consideration, the Court finds that Defendants have failed to prove that good cause exists for the amendment. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants' Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 1 CASE NO. 6:05-cv-424 (LED) Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 155 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served a copy of this document via the court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule cv-5(a)(3) on this the 17th day of November, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Rose Jones-Shine LEGAL_US_W # 54927895.1 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 2 CASE NO. 6:05-cv-424 (LED)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?