AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 163

RESPONSE in Opposition re 143 MOTION to Compel filed by AdvanceMe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 4# 6 Exhibit 5# 7 Errata 6# 8 Exhibit 7# 9 Exhibit 8# 10 Exhibit # 11 Exhibit 10# 12 Exhibit # 13 Exhibit 12# 14 Exhibit 13# 15 Exhibit 14# 16 Exhibit # 17 Exhibit 16# 18 Exhibit 17# 19 Exhibit 18# 20 Exhibit 19# 21 Exhibit 20# 22 Affidavit by Robert C. Matz)(Matz, Robert)

Download PDF
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC Doc. 163 Att. 1 Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 163 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, v. RAPIDPAY LLC, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC, and FAST TRANSACT, INC. d/b/a SIMPLE CASH, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:05-CV-424 (LED (JDL) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL On this day, the Court considered Defendants First Funds LLC, Merchant Money Tree, Inc., and Reach Financial, LLC's Motion To Compel. After careful consideration, the Court finds that Defendants have failed to prove that good cause exists for this Motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants' Motion To Compel. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL 1 CASE NO. 6:05-cv-424 (LED) Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 163 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served a copy of this document via the court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule cv-5(a)(3) on this the 28th day of November, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Rose Jones-Shine LEGAL_US_W # 55107260.1 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL 2 CASE NO. 6:05-cv-424 (LED)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?