AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 234

REPLY to Response to Motion re 215 SEALED PATENT MOTION - Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Evidence and Argument in Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity filed by First Funds, LLC, Merchant Money Tree, Inc., Reach Financial, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Exhibit A# 3 Exhibit B# 4 Exhibit C# 5 Exhibit D# 6 Exhibit E# 7 Exhibit F# 8 Exhibit G)(Gray, Joseph)

AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Doc. 234 Att. 1

Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED

Document 234

Filed 04/13/2007

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC. Plaintiff, v. RAPIDPAY, LLC, BUSINESS CAPITAL CORPORATION, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC and FAST TRANSACT, INC. d/b/a SIMPLE CASH, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

CAUSE NO. 6:05-CV-424 (LED)-(JDL)

Order Denying Plaintiff's Objections to Evidence and Argument in Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity On this day came to be considered Plaintiff's Objections to Evidence and Argument in Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity (the "Motion") filed by Plaintiff, AdvanceMe, Inc. The Court, having considered the Motion, the memoranda in support and in opposition of the Motion, and the arguments of counsel, is of the opinion that the Motion should be denied in its entirety. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

Austin 819137v.1

Dockets.Justia.com