AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 35

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 23 Amended Complaint, for Defendant Business Capital Corporation by AdvanceMe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carroll, Otis)

AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Doc. 35 Att. 1

Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED

Document 35

Filed 04/24/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, vs. RAPIDPAY LLC, BUSINESS CAPITAL CORPORATION, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC and FAST TRANSACT, INC. dba SIMPLE CASH Defendants

CASE NO. 6: 05-CV-424 LED

NO JURY REQUESTED ­ EQUITABLE RELIEF ONLY

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond for Defendant Capital Business Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to and including May 4, 2006. The Court, having considered the motion, finds that it is well taken and should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Capital Business Corporation shall have to and including May 4, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.

Dockets.Justia.com