AdvanceMe Inc v. AMERIMERCHANT LLC

Filing 85

RESPONSE in Opposition re 74 MOTION for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed by AdvanceMe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Affidavit BY MICHAEL N. EDELMAN# 3 Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit B# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D# 7 Exhibit E# 8 Exhibit F# 9 Exhibit G# 10 Exhibit H# 11 Exhibit I# 12 Exhibit J# 13 Exhibit K# 14 Exhibit L# 15 Exhibit M# 16 Exhibit N# 17 Exhibit O)(Matz, Robert)

Download PDF
AdvanceMe Inc v. AMERIMERCHANT LLC Doc. 85 Att. 1 Case 6:06-cv-00082-LED-JDL Document 85 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIMERCHANT, LLC, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06-CV-082 (LED ­ JDL) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS On this day, the Court considered Defendant AmeriMerchant's Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. After careful consideration, the Court finds that Defendant have failed to prove that good cause exists for the amendment. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants' Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 1 CASE NO. 6:06-cv-082 Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:06-cv-00082-LED-JDL Document 85 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served a copy of this document via the court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule cv-5(a)(3) on this the 17th day of November, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ Rose Jones-Shine ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 2 CASE NO. 6:06-cv-082

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?