AdvanceMe Inc v. AMERIMERCHANT LLC
Filing
85
RESPONSE in Opposition re 74 MOTION for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed by AdvanceMe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Affidavit BY MICHAEL N. EDELMAN# 3 Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit B# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D# 7 Exhibit E# 8 Exhibit F# 9 Exhibit G# 10 Exhibit H# 11 Exhibit I# 12 Exhibit J# 13 Exhibit K# 14 Exhibit L# 15 Exhibit M# 16 Exhibit N# 17 Exhibit O)(Matz, Robert)
AdvanceMe Inc v. AMERIMERCHANT LLC
Doc. 85 Att. 1
Case 6:06-cv-00082-LED-JDL
Document 85
Filed 11/20/2006
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIMERCHANT, LLC, Defendant.
§ § § § § § § § § §
CASE NO. 6:06-CV-082 (LED JDL)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
On this day, the Court considered Defendant AmeriMerchant's Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions. After careful consideration, the Court finds that Defendant have failed to prove that good cause exists for the amendment. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants' Expedited Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
1
CASE NO. 6:06-cv-082
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 6:06-cv-00082-LED-JDL
Document 85
Filed 11/20/2006
Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served a copy of this document via the court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule cv-5(a)(3) on this the 17th day of November, 2006. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date.
/s/ Rose Jones-Shine
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
2
CASE NO. 6:06-cv-082
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?