Albritton v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 255

RESPONSE to 253 Notice (Other) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Objections to Portions of the Joint Pre-Trial Order by Eric Albritton. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. 1, # 2 Ex. 2, # 3 Ex. 3, # 4 Ex. 4, # 5 Ex. 5, # 6 Ex. 6)(Patton, Nicholas)

Download PDF
Case 6:08-cv-00089-RAS Document 144 Filed 01/15/2009 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ERIC ALBRITTON, Plaintiff, VS. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § Case No. 6:08cv89 (Judge Schell) § § ORDER Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Interrogatory Responses (Dkt. 88) and Amended Motion to Compel (Dkt. 104) have been referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard A. Schell. Having reviewed the Motions and Responses with the exhibits attached, the Court DENIES Cisco's Motion to Compel as MOOT (Dkt. 88). The Court GRANTS Cisco's Amended Motion to Compel (Dkt. 104). Plaintiff Eric Albritton is ordered to fully answer Interrogatories 1-5 within five (5) days of this order. Counsel for Albritton should follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and expected local practice in this District. Defendant is granted an . additional ten (10) days after actual receipt of the answers to supplement its evidence. No further argument or briefs are allowed on this matter. SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 15th day of January, 2009. . ____________________________________ DON D. BUSH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?