Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 161

Unopposed MOTION to Seal SURREPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH PATENT RULE 3-1 AND TO EXTEND THE TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS UNDER SEAL by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 161 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED Jury Trial Demanded ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS SURREPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH PATENT RULE 3-1 AND TO EXTEND THE TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS UNDER SEAL On this day came to be considered Bedrock's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Its Surreply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Comply with Patent Rule 31 and to Extend the Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions Under Seal. After considering the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Bedrock shall have leave to file its Surreply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Comply with Patent Rule 3-1 and to Extend the Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions under seal. Dallas 294290v1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?