Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 223

RESPONSE in Opposition re #209 MOTION TO CLARIFY THE AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER re #170 Protective Order MOTION TO CLARIFY THE AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER re #170 Protective Order filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, LLC., AOL LLC, and CME GROUP INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 6:09­CV­00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER DENYING BEDROCK'S MOTION TO CLARIFY THE AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Before the Court is Bedrock's Motion to Clarify the Agreed Protective Order. (Dkt. No. 209.) After considering the Motion and the relief requested therein, the Court finds that for good cause appearing the motion should be and hereby is DENIED in its entirety. Because the Court agrees with the clarifications by Google in its Response, it is hereby ORDERED and clarified that the Protective Order 1) only permits Bedrock to print a single copy of source code that is reasonably related to this case, and 2) limits source code access to only two of Bedrock's technical advisors, consultants, and testifying experts.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?