Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 266

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #263 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Compel Non-Privileged Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock and Request for In Camera Review of Non-Privileged Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 266 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269 Jury Trial Demanded ORDER GRANTING BEDROCK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Compel Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock, and Request for In Camera Review of Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log. Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it is well taken and should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Response to Defendants' Motion to Compel Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock, and Request for In Camera Review of Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log is extended up to and including September 3, 2010. Dallas 307431v1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?