Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
283
MOTION for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness by AOL Inc, Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, MySpace Inc., Softlayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Decl. of Antonio Sistos ISO Defendants' MSJ of Indefiniteness, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Sistos, Antonio)
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Doc. 283 Att. 2
EXHIBIT A
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 6:09-CV-0029
SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE, INC., AMAZON.COM INC., MATCH.COM, LLC and AOL LLC. Defendants. _______________________________ RED HAT, INC., Plaintiff, vs. BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Defendant. ________________________________________________________ HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DR. RICHARD NEMES New York, New York Tuesday, August 31, 2010 Reported by: AYLETTE GONZALEZ JOB NO. 144128 Case No. 6:09-cv-00549
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
DAY: TIME:
August 31, 2010 9:19 a.m.
Videotaped Deposition of DR. RICHARD NEMES, held at the offices of McKOOL SMITH, One Bryant Park, New York, New York 10036, pursuant to NOTICE, before AYLETTE GONZALEZ, a Notary Public of the State of New York.
2
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4
other times removing some, but not all of them. And at other times, choosing to
remove none of them." Do you see that? A. Q. I saw that. It continues -- it says, "Such
16:20:37
5 6 7 8 9
a dynamic routine decision might be based on factors such as, for example, how much memory is available in the system storage pool, general system load, time of day, the number of records currently residing in the information system, and other factors both internal and external to the information storage and retrieval system itself." You see that? A. Q. I see that. My question is: First of all,
16:20:47 10
11 12 13 14
16:21:01 15
16 17 18 19
is that the pros that, in your view, describe the means for dynamically determining the maximum number? MR. CURRY: Q. Objection to form.
16:21:10 20
21 22 23 24
The record should reflect the
witness is turning the various pages to the 120 Patent. A. I'm not certain that there
16:21:47 25
287
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4
isn't other pros that also describes it. I'm just trying to be really careful here to be very accurate in my answer, but that does -- that is the pros that is associated with Claim 2. Q. Can you tell me, sir, in that
16:22:04
5 6 7 8 9
pros, what is the means for dynamically determining the maximum number? A. I think your -MR. CURRY: A. claim. Q. You're right. I am. You didn't Objection to form.
16:22:16 10
11 12 13 14
-- asking me to interpret the
Let's be specific.
16:22:21 15
16 17 18 19
write any code that shows how to do that, right? A. shows that. Q. You didn't identify any device I didn't write any code that
16:22:31 20
21 22 23 24
that's capable of doing that, right? A. Q. Right. You didn't identify any
software program that's capable of doing that, right? A. Right.
16:22:39 25
288
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4
Q.
As you sit here today, can you
think of any structure at all, any sort of physical or nonphysical device or system, that you described to be able to perform that means of dynamically determining a maximum number? MR. CURRY: A. Q. Objection to form.
16:22:51
5 6 7 8 9
What's a nonphysical device? Software. MR. CURRY: Objection to form.
16:23:01 10
11 12 13 14
A.
Then I guess I don't understand
the question because I don't think of software as a device. Q. Let's go physical then. Any
16:23:10 15
16 17 18 19
physical device that you could identify that could perform any of that means? A. I could take -- I could program
a computer to perform the tasks described by that means. Q. A. Q. Did you ever do that? No. It continues to say, "The
16:23:32 20
21 22 23 24
record search means" do you see that? A. Q. What column? Claim 2. Talks about the
16:23:51 25
289
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4
A. the same. Q. the "it's"? A.
Yeah, I believe the wording is
When you say "it's," what is
16:28:55
5 6 7 8 9
Either this paragraph or -- the
entire paragraph or parts of it are identical in the two patents. Q. A. Q. Between the 120 and the 499? That's right. In fact, they're so similar You were
16:29:05 10
11 12 13 14
that you just confused them.
looking at the; 499 when I was asking you questions about the 120; is that correct? A. Q. That's correct. So, the question is: In the
16:29:13 15
16 17 18 19
code that's identified, the pseudocode you wrote, there's no code that performs a hashing function; is that right? MR. CURRY: A. Objection to form.
16:29:30 20
21 22 23 24
If you look at column 11, the
second -- that begin -- no, it's not the same begin that you mentioned earlier. But in search table procedure, go down and find begin and look at the line after that. "Index: = hash (record_key)";
16:29:47 25
294
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
DR. RICHARD NEMES HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
8/31/2010
1 2 3 4
there is the location of a hash function. Q. It doesn't indicate how to
hash, does it? A. Q. function? A. function. Q. Where is the hash function in It says, go call the hash No. It just says there is a hash
16:30:04
5 6 7 8 9
16:30:10 10
11 12 13 14
the four corners of the 120 Patent? A. implementer. Q. That means the person whose To be supplied by the
designing the system does this? A. Right. MR. STERN: flight. I have to catch a My
16:30:18 15
16 17 18 19
Thank you very much.
colleagues here will continue your interrogation. THE WITNESS: flight. MR. STERN: much. today. Off the record. Thank you very Have a safe
16:30:26 20
21 22 23 24
I appreciate you coming here
16:30:34 25
295
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 877.955.3855
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?