Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
292
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #263 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Compel Non-Privileged Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock and Request for In Camera Review of Non-Privileged Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log by AOL Inc, Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, MySpace Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Doc. 292 Att. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 6:09CV00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL NON-PRIVILEGED TESTIMONY AND DOCUMENTS FROM MIKHAIL LOTVIN AND BEDROCK AND REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF NON-PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS ON BEDROCK'S PRIVILEGE LOG Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time of Defendants Google Inc., Match.com, LLC, MySpace, Inc., AOL Inc., and Yahoo! Inc. to File their Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock and Request for In Camera Review of Non-Privileged Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log. Having considered the Motion, and finding that good cause exists and the relief sought is justified, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Google Inc., Match.com, LLC, MySpace, Inc., AOL Inc., and Yahoo! Inc. shall have up to and including September 22, 2010 to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Testimony and Documents from Mikhail Lotvin and Bedrock and Request for In Camera Review of Non-Privileged Documents on Bedrock's Privilege Log.
{A07\7713\0011\W0442401.2 }
Dockets.Justia.com
{A07\7713\0011\W0442401.2 }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?