Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 585

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages Defendants Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation on Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement by AOL Inc, Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, MySpace Inc., Softlayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chaikovsky, Yar)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 585 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 6:09­CV­00269 Hon. John D. Love JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER Before the Court is Defendants' SoftLayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Google, Inc., MySpace, Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Match.com LLC and AOL Inc. (collectively "Defendants") Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations on their Reply to Bedrock's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Doc. No. 585). The Court, having reviewed the motion, finds that the motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore: ORDERED that Defendants are granted leave to exceed the page limitation in Local Rule CV-7(a)(3) by five (5) pages on the Reply to Bedrock's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?