Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
624
***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Additional Attachments to Main Document: #578 Proposed Pretrial Order, #618 Additional Attachments to Main Document.. (Attachments: #1 Amended Exhibit L)(Jones, Michael) Modified on 3/22/2011 (mjc, ).
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Doc. 624
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC, Plaintiff, v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 6:09-CV-269-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
GOOGLE'S NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENT TO PROPOSED JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER FOR GOOGLE AND MATCH.COM Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") respectfully submits the following additional attachment to the Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order for Google and Match.com (Dkt. 578):
1.
Exhibit L--Google's Amended Exhibit List (amended)
Dated: March 21, 2011
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Evette D. Pennypacker (with permission by Michael E. Jones) Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 POTTER MINTON 110 N. College Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 Email: mikejones@potterminton.com
Dockets.Justia.com
Claude M. Stern Evette D. Pennypacker Todd M. Briggs QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-801-5000 Facsimile: 650-801-5100 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email: toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com ATTORNEYS FOR GOOGLE INC. and MATCH.COM, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 21st day of March 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?