Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 634

NOTICE by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC re #579 Proposed Pretrial Order, NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS TO JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F-2, #2 Exhibit I)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 634 Att. 2 Exhibit I Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, INC., AOL INC., AND CME GROUP INC., Defendants. CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED Jury Trial Demanded PLAINTIFF BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC ("Bedrock"), pursuant to the Court's Docket Control Order and Orders amending Docket Control Order entered in this case, provides this list of objections to Defendants SoftLayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., MySpace Inc., Amazon.Com Inc., and AOL Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") rebuttal depositions designations. Bedrock expressly reserves the right to supplement, augment, or otherwise modify the exchanged designations based on circumstances as they may evolve prior to the commencement of trial. Bedrock's objections to Defendants' rebuttal deposition designations are made in reliance on the Defendants' trial witness lists and the labeling of those witnesses as will call. At this time, Bedrock objects to Defendants' rebuttal deposition designations testimony as follows: BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 1 Dallas 320571v1 Yahoo! 30(b)(6) Deposition of Quentin Laurent Barnes January 7, 2011 From (page:line) 13:2 To (page:line) 13:4 Objections 801/802 Deposition of David Barrow - January 6, 2011 From (page:line) 7:11 14:8 15:1 15:24 16:12 16:23 20:17 20:21 24:10 24:21 26:12 26:24 28:4 28:16 29:15 34:25 45:11 47:3 48:17 50:9 52:11 52:18 53:16 66:6 66:10 66:20 86:7 109:2 114:10 122:20 123:21 123:5 130:15 137:12 137:15 To (page:line) 7:14 14:8 15:1 15:24 16:12 16:23 20:17 21:4 24:10 24:24 26:12 25:4 28:4 28:16 29:17 34:25 45:18 47:8 48:22 50:9 52:11 52:18 53:16 66:6 66:16 66:25 86:24 109:14 114:20 122:20 123:21 123:5 130:15 137:13 137:22 Objections 106, IA, INC, IQ NR; INC BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 2 Dallas 320571v1 Deposition of David Barrow - January 6, 2011 From (page:line) 139:9 139:15 146:18 To (page:line) 139:13 139:22 146:23 Objections MySpace 30(b)(6) Deposition of Chris Bell January 13, 2011 From (page:line) 20:16 23:13 To (page:line) 21:14 24:1 Objections 801 801, CP (26:5-12) Yahoo! 30(b)(6) Deposition of Michael Fletcher Christian January 11, 2011 From (page:line) 26:5 38:15 52:4 52:9 55:23 66:2 68:20 89:21 93:7 113:1 To (page:line) 26:11 38:19 52:6 52:11 56:8 66:4 69:2 90:1 93:12 113:12 Objections 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801, CP (12:19) 602, CS, F Amazon 30(b)(6) Deposition of Matthew T. Corddry January 6, 2011 From (page:line) 20:20 21:14 31:7 77:3 97:22 98:4 98:7 102:11 105:19 108:13 109:9 To (page:line) 21:2 21:17 31:16 77:12 98:2 98:6 98:11 102:20 106:8 109:1 109:18 Objections 402, 403, 801, 802 403, 801, 802, MC 801, 802 801, 802, 402, 403 402, 403, 801, 802 402, 403, 801, 802 402, 403, 801, 802 402, 403, 801, 802 801, 802, 403 801, 802 801, 802 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 3 Dallas 320571v1 Amazon 30(b)(6) Deposition of Matthew T. Corddry January 6, 2011 From (page:line) 114:11 122:9 125:22 136:9 136:12 136:18 154:9 155:16 156:16 157:3 172:25 189:18 192:14 201:19 201:22 216:13 216:21 249:6 259:19 259:23 261:5 261:9 To (page:line) 114:14 122:17 126:11 136:10 136:17 136:23 155:15 156:6 156:21 157:9 173:9 190:4 192:24 201:20 202:5 216:20 217:5 249:8 259:21 260:4 261:7 261:12 Objections 801, 802, 403 801, 802 CS, 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802, WC 801, 802, WC 801, 802, 403 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 Deposition of Joseph D'Avanzo - December 7, 2010 From (page:line) 84:12 88:16 To (page:line) 84:22 90:1 Objections 88:16 - INC; 89:19 - 90:1 L, AR, 602 Softlayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Nathan Day - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 86:10 86:14 103:12 109:4 117:9 125:16 129:9 130:12 To (page:line) 86:12 86:22 103:25 109:15 119:6 126:6 130:6 130:15 Objections 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 4 Dallas 320571v1 Softlayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Nathan Day - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 130:17 140:14 140:18 155:20 160:12 160:16 161:25 163:24 166:8 167:2 167:15 167:21 168:25 213:17 214:1 214:23 216:3 216:18 216:23 217:3 229:2 229:24 230:7 230:10 231:14 231:18 231:25 232:21 232:25 233:19 234:4 236:21 237:1 237:16 241:7 244:10 244:13 253:3 253:17 253:23 260:12 260:17 261:16 To (page:line) 130:24 140:16 140:25 156:4 160:14 160:25 163:4 164:21 166:22 167:13 167:19 167:25 169:10 213:16 214:15 215:8 216:7 216:21 217:1 217:8 229:16 230:5 230:8 230:25 231:16 231:23 232:6 232:23 233:3 233:23 234:15 236:24 237:14 237:19 241:9 244:11 244:24 253:11 253:21 254:1 260:15 261:14 261:18 Objections 801, 802 801, 802, NR 801, 802, NR 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802, CS 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802, NR 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 5 Dallas 320571v1 Softlayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Nathan Day - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 283:25 To (page:line) 285:2 Objections 801, 802 Deposition of - Ilya Kravchenko - December 17, 2010 From (page:line) 8:14 13:1 13:8 14:7 18:14 33:13 116:2 116:9 116:20 33:13 116:2 116:9 116:20 33:13 116:2 116:9 116:20 20:5 20:19 18:14 20:5 20:19 18:14 23:14 25:3 26:22 27:17 169:18 170:2 23:14 25:3 26:22 27:17 169:18 170:2 34:17 35:2 34:17 To (page:line) 8:20 13:4 14:1 14:20 20:4 33:16 116:6 116:17 116:23 33:16 116:6 116:17 116:23 33:16 116:6 116:17 116:23 20:8 21:2 20:4 20:8 21:2 20:4 23:22 25:17 27:10 28:19 169:22 170:22 23:22 25:17 27:10 28:19 169:22 170:22 34:19 35:19 34:19 Objections 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 INC; 801 801 801 801 801 801 INC; 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 NR; 801 801 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 6 Dallas 320571v1 Deposition of - Ilya Kravchenko - December 17, 2010 From (page:line) 35:2 40:9 63:14 63:18 64:5 40:9 63:14 63:18 64:5 42:21 47:13 34:17 35:2 57:3 64:12 64:12 64:12 64:12 64:12 68:22 72:4 72:12 70:13 76:18 76:24 76:18 76:24 76:18 76:24 76:18 76:24 76:18 76:24 76:18 76:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 To (page:line) 35:19 41:3 63:15 64:2 64:7 41:3 63:15 64:2 64:7 43:2 47:14 34:19 35:19 57:13 65:7 65:7 65:7 65:7 65:7 68:24 72:9 72:24 71:6 76:21 77:6 76:21 77:6 76:21 77:6 76:21 77:6 76:21 77:6 76:21 77:6 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 Objections NR; 801 801 801 801 64:7 - INC; 64:5 - 64:7 - 801 801 801 801 64:7 - INC; 64:5 - 64:7 - 801 602; 801 47:14 - INC; 47:13 - 47:14 801 801 NR; 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 7 Dallas 320571v1 Deposition of - Ilya Kravchenko - December 17, 2010 From (page:line) 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 To (page:line) 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 Objections 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 8 Dallas 320571v1 Deposition of - Ilya Kravchenko - December 17, 2010 From (page:line) 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 87:24 84:17 85:19 87:7 87:20 117:16 117:16 97:11 117:16 97:11 97:11 97:11 49:21 87:7 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 112:8 116:2 To (page:line) 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 87:25 84:22 86:10 87:13 87:22 117:22 117:22 97:18 117:22 97:18 97:18 97:18 50:6 87:13 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 112:14 116:6 Objections 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801; 602 801 801; 602 801; 602 801; 602 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 9 Dallas 320571v1 Deposition of - Ilya Kravchenko - December 17, 2010 From (page:line) 116:9 116:20 116:2 116:9 116:20 116:2 116:9 116:20 188:20 128:10 128:10 188:20 135:5 136:19 137:10 140:19 154:20 155:13 155:22 156:9 156:11 156:15 128:10 129:3 159:21 171:24 128:10 173:16 177:9 177:19 179:1 177:9 177:19 179:1 To (page:line) 116:17 116:23 116:6 116:17 116:23 116:6 116:17 116:23 189:12 128:17 128:17 189:12 135:8 136:25 137:24 140:25 155:8 155:19 156:4 156:9 156:12 156:17 128:17 130:22 160:2 172:23 128:17 173:16 177:16 177:20 179:25 177:16 177:20 179:25 Objections 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801; MC 801 801 801; MC 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 801 SoftLayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Jacob Linscott - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 21:14 21:19 To (page:line) 21:17 21:25 Objections 801, 802 801, 802 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 10 Dallas 320571v1 SoftLayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Jacob Linscott - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 22:12 22:16 43:3 49:17 50:4 64:16 66:3 66:7 To (page:line) 22:14 22:19 43:6 49:23 50:8 64:23 66:5 66:13 Objections 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802 Deposition of Alexey Kuznetsov - January 27, 2011 From (page:line) 87:11 99:5 To (page:line) 88:3 99:24 Objections BER, 403 BER, 403 Amazon 30(b)(6) Deposition of Stefan Leigland - January 6, 2011 From (page:line) 31:23 33:1 48:7 60:22 69:24 70:17 71:13 80:2 85:13 85:17 87:22 To (page:line) 32:2 33:18 49:9 61:4 70:8 70:21 72:9 80:9 85:15 85:18 87:24 Objections 801, 802 801, 802, 403 801, 802 801, 802 IQ, 403, attorney comment IQ, 403, attorney comment (70:17-18) 801, 802 801, 802 801, 802, NR 801, 802, NR 801, 802 MySpace 30(b)(6) Deposition of Mimi Nguyen - December 14, 2010 From (page:line) 85:23 86:1 To (page:line) 85:24 86:8 Objections 801/802, BER 801/802, BER BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 11 Dallas 320571v1 MySpace 30(b)(6) Deposition of Mimi Nguyen - December 14, 2010 From (page:line) 86:11 86:23 To (page:line) 86:20 86:24 Objections 801/802, BER 801/802, BER Yahoo! 30(b)(6) Deposition of Samuel J. Wolff - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) 28:3 53:11 53:21 57:25 58:13 169:21 188:11 189:11 213:12 214:3 214:12 To (page:line) 28:4 53:13 53:21 58:1 58:13 170:10 188:12 189:11 213:14 214:4 214:12 Objections Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment 403, MIL Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Yahoo! 30(b)(6) Deposition of Luke Yeh - December 16, 2010 From (page:line) 7:17 27:21 64:2 64:9 65:2 65:25 66:9 66:12 67:14 67:19 77:12 78:23 To (page:line) 7:17 27:21 64:3 64:10 65:3 65:25 66:9 66:14 67:14 67:19 77:12 78:24 Objections Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment Attorney comment BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 12 Dallas 320571v1 OBJECTION KEY TO DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Code 106 Objection This testimony is objectionable because it is incomplete and the introduction of the remaining portions ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with it (see F.R.E. 106). This testimony is objectionable because it is not relevant (see F.R.E. 402). Misleading. Confusion of issues. This testimony is objectionable because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Compromise and offer to compromise (FRE 408). This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes testimony on a matter as to which the witness lacks personal knowledge (see F.R.E. 602). This testimony is objectionable because it is opinion testimony by a lay witness that is not reasonably based on perception and helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in dispute (see F.R.E. 701). Hearsay. This testimony is objectionable because it is a statement made by one other than the declarant while testifying at trial, offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted and not subject to any hearsay exception (see F.R.E. 801 and 802). This testimony is objectionable because it concerns a document for which authentication is lacking (see F.R.E. 901). Attorney Client Privilege and/or Work Product Immunity Asked and Answered This testimony is objectionable because it assumes a fact not in evidence. Argumentative (see FRCP 611(a)). Bolstering. This testimony in objectionable because it is improper to bolster the credibility of a witness before credibility is attacked (see FRCP 608(a)). Not best evidence (FRE 1002) Compound Question Calls for Speculation 402 403 408 602 701 801 A A/C AA AF AR B BER CQ CS BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 13 Dallas 320571v1 E This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes attempted expert testimony from a person who was not designated as an expert and who did not submit an expert report (see FRCP 26). This testimony is objectionable because it lacks foundation. This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes harrassment or it is unduly embarrassing to the witness (see F.R.E. 611(f)). This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete answer. This testimony is objectionable because it has characterized a person or conduct with unwarranted suggestive, argumentative, or impertinent language (see FRCP 103(c); 404-405). Improper opinion testimony by expert witness (FRE 702) Incomplete question/answer. This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete question. Mischaracterizes witness's testimony Nonresponsive Outside the scope of Rule 30(b)(6) topics. Vague. Waste of time/Cumulative evidence (FRE 403) Leading the Witness (F.R.E. 611(c)). F H IA IC IE INC IQ MC NR OS V WC L BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 14 Dallas 320571v1 Dated: March 22, 2011. Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH, P.C. _/s/ Douglas A. Cawley ________ Douglas A. Cawley, Lead Attorney Texas Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com Theodore Stevenson, III Texas Bar No. 19196650 tstevenson@mckoolsmith.com Rosemary T. Snider Texas Bar No. 18796500 rsnider@mckoolsmith.com Scott W. Hejny Texas State Bar No. 24038952 shejny@mckoolsmith.com Jason D. Cassady Texas Bar No. 24045625 jcassady@mckoolsmith.com J. Austin Curry Texas Bar No. 24059636 acurry@mckoolsmith.com Phillip M. Aurentz Texas State Bar No. 24059404 paurentz@mckoolsmith.com Daniel R. Pearson Texas State Bar No. 24070398 dpearson@mckoolsmith.com McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: 214-978-4000 Facsimile: 214-978-4044 Sam F. Baxter Texas Bar No. 01938000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com 104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 0 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 923-9000 Facsimile: (903) 923-9099 BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 15 Dallas 320571v1 Robert M. Parker Texas Bar No. 15498000 Robert Christopher Bunt Texas Bar No. 00787165 PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: 903-531-3535 Facsimile: 903-533-9687 E-mail: rmparker@pbatyler.com E-mail: rcbunt@pbatyler.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that, on March 22, 2010, the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). /s/ Jason D. Cassady Jason D. Cassady ______ BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REBUTTAL DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS PAGE 16 Dallas 320571v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?