Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 641

***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Additional Attachments to Main Document: #579 Proposed Pretrial Order,.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit J to Proposed Joint Pretrial Order; Objections by Defendants, SoftLayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., MySpace, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and AOL Inc.)(Low, John) Modified on 3/23/2011 (mjc, ).

Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Doc. 641 Att. 1

Exhibit J

Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, PLAINTIFF VS. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CITIWARE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., YAHOO!, INC., MYSPACE INC., AMAZON.COM INC., PAYPAL INC., MATCH.COM, INC., AOL LLC, and CME GROUP INC., DEFENDANTS § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED-JDL § § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § § § §

JOINT OBJECTIONS TO BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS BY DEFENDANTS SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., YAHOO!, INC., MYSPACE, INC, AMAZON.COM, INC., AND AOL INC.

Defendants Softlayer Technologies, Inc., Yahoo!, Inc., MySpace, Inc, Amazon.com, Inc., and AOL LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), pursuant to the Court's Docket Control Order and Orders amending the Docket Control Order entered in this case, provides to Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC ("Bedrock") this list of objections to Bedrock's counter deposition designations. Defendants expressly reserve the right to supplement, augment, or otherwise modify the exchanged designations based on circumstances as they may evolve prior to the commencement of trial. Defendants' objections to Bedrock's deposition designations are made in reliance on Bedrock's trial witness lists and the labeling of those witnesses as will call. At this time, Defendants object to Bedrock's deposition designations testimony as follows:

Page 1
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

From (page:line) 8:1 36:6 45:8 48:20 51:25 56:13 56:21 80:7 80:11 101:8 138:2 139:17 141:15 142:19 143:17 143:22 144:1 144:16 145:4 146:4 146:9 146:21 147:11 149:12 149:24 151:11 152:16 154:9 155:2 156:10 156:15 156:18 156:24 157:14 157:19 157:22

Deposition of Joseph D'Avanzo - December 7, 20101 To (page:line) Objections 8:5 None 36:8 None 45:13 None 48:25 104a, 402 52:4 602 56:15 402 57:7 None 80:9 DI 80:12 DI 101:15 None 138:23 AA 141:13 AA, 104a, 402 142:4 104a, 402, 611c 143:15 104a, 602 143:20 103, 104a 143:24 402, 403 144:5 402, 403 144:23 MT, 611c 146:2 402, 104a, 602 146:6 402, V 146:19 104a 147:9 104a, CC 147:11 104a, CC 149:22 MT 151:5 104a 152:14 CC 154:6 402, 403, 602 154:25 701 155:10 402, 403 104a, 402, 403, 602, 701 156:13 104a, 402, 403, 602, 701 156:16 104a, 402, 403, 602, 701 156:22 156:24 None 157:17 402, 403 157:20 402, 403 157:25 402, 403

For witnesses D'Avanzo, Miller, McDonald use the SECOND KEY OBJECTIONS FOR DEPOSITION DESIGNATION TESTIMONY AND DEPOSITION EXHIBITS at the end of this exhibit, for all others that require a key, use the FIRST KEY OBJECTIONS FOR DEPOSITION DESIGNATION TESTIMONY AND DEPOSITION EXHIBITS at the end of this exhibit.
1

Page 2
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Yahoo! 30(b)(6) Deposition of Michael Fletcher Christian January 11, 2011 From (page:line) 48:25 113:14 To (page:line) 49:4 113:24 Objections None None

From (page:line) 8:4 8:15 14:19 72:25 117:23 113:2 148:5 155:1 161:7 161:14 198:24 204:6 236:9 286:13 287:10 292:3 294:7 300:19 303:24 314:23 317:13 319:4 323:16

Deposition of David Garrod - December 15, 2010 To (page:line) Objections 402, 403 8:9 402, 403 8:19 402, 403. 15:4 402, 403 73:20 402, 403 118:11 Incomplete, 402, 403 113:11 402, 403 148:18 402, 403, 701 misleading 155:10 402, 403, 701 161:9 402, 403, 701 162:20 402, 403, 701 199:19 402, 403, 701 204:22 402, 403 236:14 402, 403, 701, misleading 286:25 402, 403, 701, misleading 288:12 402, 403, 701, misleading 292:14 402, 403, 701 294:10 Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 301:4 Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 304:7 Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 315:10 Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 317:24 Incomplete, 402, 403, 319:9 402, 403 324:12 Deposition of David Garrod - December 16, 2010 To (page:line) Objections Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 370:6 372:4 None 372:17 None 375:22 None 376:3 None 378:15 None 380:12 None 486:13 402, 403 486:22 402, 403 487:12 402, 403 487:14 402, 403 487:20 402, 403 Page 3

From (page:line) 367:5 371:20 372:5 374:2 375:23 377:25 380:3 486:8 486:15 486:24 487:14 487:16

DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

487:22 490:3 501:4 501:20 503:24 504:4 519:13 536:3 538:18 540:6 541:3 541:9 541:17 545:17 546:9 549:9 552:1 553:7 554:8 555:17 556:24 557:6 562:23 564:1 571:3 572:13 573:12 575:3 592:16 594:10 608:8

488:17 490:20 501:18 501:23 504:2 504:6 519:25 537:18 540:2 540:21 541:7 541:15 543:25 546:7 548:24 550:17 552:5 554:6 554:8 556:17 557:4 557:11 563:7 564:4 571:15 572:23 574:3 575:10 594:1 597:3 608:8

402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 None None None None None None None None None None 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 None None None Incomplete, 402, 403, 701 Form, misleading Form, misleading Incomplete, unintelligible,

From (page:line) 9:11 24:23 28:1 29:14 39:12 43:5 50:24 52:7 54:8 54:14 94:1 94:4

Deposition of Alexey Kuznetsov - January 27, 2011 To (page:line) Objections 9:13 402, 403 25:2 None 28:3 Lack of foundation, 402, 403 30:1 None 39:18 None 43:9 402, 403 51:4 Lack of foundation, 402, 403 52:14 None 54:12 None 54:20 None 94:2 402, 403 94:4 402, 403 Page 4

DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Amazon 30(b)(6) Deposition of Stefan Leigland - January 6, 2011 From (page:line) To (page:line) Objections 29:25 30:3 None 30:16 30:20 402, 403 31:12 31:22 402, 403 32:21 32:25 402, 403 35:6 35:13 None 36:4 36:21 None 38:5 38:17 None 41:1 41:4 402, 403 45:9 45:14 402, 403 45:16 45:20 402, 403 46:18 46:23 None 47:3 47:14 None 50:9 50:11 402, 403, 701 50:13 50:13 402, 403, 701 53:11 54:13 402, 403, 701 62:25 63:2 None 65:15 67:4 402, 403 67:9 69:6 402, 403 69:19 70:4 402, 403 72:10 73:9 402, 403 73:11 73:12 402, 403 74:4 74:8 402, 403 74:10 74:10 402, 403 75:1 75:7 402, 403 77:18 78:2 402, 403 84:11 84:13 402, 403 84:15 84:16 402, 403

Page 5
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

SoftLayer 30(b)(6) Deposition of Jacob Linscott - January 4, 2011 From (page:line) To (page:line) Objections None 27:21 28:6 None 31:6 31:7 None 31:16 31:19 None 34:3 34:8 403, 602 37:4 37:11 403, 602 37:19 37:22 403, 602 37:24 39:7 403, 602 39:9 39:11 106, 403, 602 39:22 39;25 403, 602 40:2 40:20 None 49:3 49:4 403, 602 59:22 60:4 None 64:16 64:19 403, 602 67:4 67:6 None 68:11 68:17 403, 602 69:8 70:1 Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin - December 28, 2010 To (page:line) Objections 75:12 75:22 100:11 402/403 101:7 402/403 103:11 104:3 K/402/403 141:5 141:17 K 239:1 K 240:5 L, 402/403 240:14 K,L, 402/403 240:21 K,L, 402/403 241:5 402/403, 611c 241:11 402/403, 611c 241:17 402/403, 611c 242:16 402/403, 611c 242:22 402/403, 611c 243:5 402/403, 611c 244:11 402/403, 611c,; H, P, B, A, K

From (page:line) 75:11 75:17 99:18 100:20 103:9 103:13 141:4 141:7 238:5 239:4 240:8 240:18 240:24 241:9 241:13 241:20 242:18 242:25 243:9

Page 6
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

From (page:line) 8:3 8:23 9:17 10:8 10:22 11:16 12:4 12:18 13:4 14:5 15:7 16:6 22:1 24:24 25:13 26:2 27:6 27:16 27:21 28:4 28:12 28:22 29:7 29:17 30:1 30:11 31:4 31:20 32:7 32:22 33:16 33:19 34:7 71:12 75:9 128:15 152:7 152:17 153:10 172:15 172:19 173:1 191:9 191:12

Deposition of Mikhail Lotvin ­ June 4, 2011 To (page:line) Objections 8:6 402/403 9:14 402/403 10:5 402/403 10:20 402/403 11:13 402/403 11:24 402/403 12:16 402/403 13:1 402/403 14:3 402/403 15:5 402/403 15:14 402/403 21:24 402/403 24:20 402/403 25:11 402/403 25:16 402/403 27:4 402/403, 27:13 402/403 27:18 402/403 28:2 402/403 28:10 402/403 28:19 402/403 29:3 402/403 29:13 402/403, 29:23 402/403 30:9 402/403 31:2 402/403 31:18 402/403 32:5 402/403 32:19 402/403 33:12 402/403 33:17 402/403 34:5 402/403 34:19 402/403 71:16 75:13 128:23 402/403, K 152:13 A, B 153:6 153:14 172:17 172:19 174:6 402/403 191:10 191:16 Page 7

DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

191:19 192:3 192:21 215:5 216:1 216:7 229:20 230:2

191:22 192:6 193:2 215:16 216;5 216:12 229:23 230:8

incomplete

From (page:line) 21:6 21:19 22:19 26:16 28:10 33:3 33:13 33:19 34:14 38:21 39:3 40:5 43:6 46:8 61:10 61:12 79:4 79:10 79:12 87:15 87:19 96:2 102:7 104:8 105:20 106:5 107:6 110:18 111:18 114:21 115:4 115:23 117:6 117:24 118:12 118:20

Deposition of Daniel McDonald - January 10, 2011 To (page:line) Objections 21:17 None 21:19 None 22:24 None 26:21 None 28:11 None 33:11 None 33:17 None 33:19 None 34:15 None 38:23 None 39:10 None 40:15 None 43:9 None 46:19 None 61:10 None 61:13 None 79:8 402 79:10 402 79:13 402 87:16 None 87:20 None 402, 403, DI 96:6 102:10 402, 403 402, 403, MIL, 802, 701, DI 104:24 105:23 None 106:11 None 108:1 None 111:4 None 402, 403, MIL, 802, 701, DI, A, 114:18 402, 403, A, V, AA 114:24 402, 403, A, V, AA 115:20 402, 403, A, V 117:4 402, 403, A, V 117:20 402, 403, A, V, AA 118:8 402, 403, A, V, AA 118:16 402, 403, A, V, AA 118:24 Page 8

DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

119:6 119:11 119:22 120:9 120:22 122:7 122:20 124:9 125:14 127:9 128:18 128:24 131:4 131:14 133:4 133:16 135:12 137:11

119:8 119:18 120:3 120:18 121:8 122:16 123:14 125:4 127:6 127:13 128:20 129:2 131:9 131:21 133:13 133:17 135:22 139:8

402, 403, A, V, AA 402, 403, A, V, AA 402, 403, A, V 402, 403, A, V, AA 402, 403, A, V 402, 403, V, DI 402, 403, DI 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403, A, 602 None None None None 402, 403, V 402, 403, V None 402, 403, 802, 701, DI

From (page:line) 70:3 71:14 72:18 75:5 77:11

Deposition of Ed Miller - December 6, 2010 To (page:line) Objections 70:16 B 71:17 B, 402 74:5 B, 104a 76:12 B 77:13 B, 104a

Deposition of Shawn D. Ostermann, Ph.D. - January 6, 2011 From (page:line) To (page:line) Objections 20:21 21:6 402, 403 22:7 22:21 402, 403 25:11 25:16 Speculation, 402, 403 35:1 35:5 402, 403, 701 37:21 38:6 None 41:2 41:3 402, 403 41:6 41:13 402, 403 44:5 44:11 None 45:19 46:12 402, 403 46:21 47:8 402, 403 49:2 49:14 None 49:21 49:25 None 59:1 59:17 None 60:6 61:10 402, 403 70:15 72:12 402, 403 73:19 74:3 402, 403 Page 9
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

74:9 76:9 77:1 77:6 77:13 78:5 80:1 84:5 84:12 84:22 85:7 86:7 86:11 87:3 88:18 90:19 90:22 91:10 91:21 92:3 92:15 93:9 93:20 95:15 99:3 100:19 100:22 101:15 101:19 102:2 104:5 105:9 107:3 112:19

75:4 76:24 77:4 77:11 77:25 78:13 81:13 84:8 84:14 84:24 85:14 86:9 86:11 87:11 89:14 90:20 90:22 91:14 92:1 92:13 92:19 93:12 93:23 95:25 99:7 100:20 100:25 101:17 101:19 103:17 104:16 105:17 108:5 113:14

402, 403 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 None None 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403, 701 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403 402, 403

From (page:line) 26:9 27:6 32:6 32:9 32:13 33:14 33:17 34:4 34:7

Deposition of Jeffrey Schiller ­ January 7, 2011 To (page:line) Objections 26:12 None 27:8 None 32:7 None 32:11 None 32:13 None 33:15 None 33:17 None 34:5 None 34:7 None Page 10

DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

39:20 44:8 45:6 59:21 61:1 62:4

40:5 44:15 45:10 60:16 61:5 63:11

None None None None None K

Deposition of Christopher Van Wyk ­ January 4, 2010 From (page:line) To (page:line) Objections 7:1 7:3 402, 403 7:17 7:19 402, 403 20:9 20:18 Foundation, 402, 403, 701 21:5 21:18 Foundation, 402, 403, 701 29:18 29:22 None 30:12 30:13 None 44:24 45:5 Foundation, 402, 403 47:6 47:16 Speculation, 402. 403

FIRST KEY OBJECTIONS FOR DEPOSITION DESIGNATION TESTIMONY AND DEPOSITION EXHIBITS Code Objection -- Short Phrase A B Authentication Best evidence Objection ­ Full Description The exhibit has not been properly authenticated for admission into evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 104, 901. The information in the exhibit is less reliable and less pertinent than other evidence, and should be excluded pursuant to the best evidence rule. Fed. R. Evid. 403, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1007.

C D H

Compromise/Settl The exhibit contains comprise or settlement negotiations. Fed. R. Evid. ement 408. Discovery deadline Hearsay The exhibit has not been produced or was produced after the close of discovery or after the deadline in this case, January 12, 2011. Testimony constitutes or contains hearsay in that it is an out-of court statement offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 802. Witness lacks personal knowledge to testify to matter under Fed. R. Evid. 602.00

K

Personal Knowledge

Page 11
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Code

Objection -- Short Phrase

Objection ­ Full Description The exhibit contains matter that is not considered evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 401. Rather, the exhibit contains legal conclusions, statutory language, case language, or attorney argument of supposition that is impressible and prejudicial. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403; Order No. 2 (Ground Rule 9.1). The methodology relied upon by the expert is not sufficiently reliable to assist the trier-of fact. Fed. R. Evid. 702. The fact, data, or both, underlying the expert opinion are not reasonably relied upon by the experts in the field. Fed. R. Evid. 703. The testimony is prejudicial in that its probative value, if any, is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the Court, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 403. The exhibit or testimony is irrelevant; it does not tend to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of this action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 401. All or part of the exhibit is illegible, unintelligible, or unreadable. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 1003. The exhibit is improperly submitted as a physical exhibit or improperly submitted as a written or documentary exhibit. Leading question. Privileged under Fed. R. Evid. 502.

L

Legal

M O P

Methodology unreliable Opinion/data/fact unreliable Prejudicial

R

Relevance

U W X PR

Unintelligible Written/Physical exhibit Leading Privileged

Page 12
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

SECOND KEY OBJECTIONS FOR DEPOSITION DESIGNATION TESTIMONY AND DEPOSITION EXHIBITS

Page 13
DEFENDANT'S COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS