Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 674

REPLY to Response to Motion re #587 SEALED PATENT MOTION IN LIMINE filed by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Phillip Aurentz, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 674 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269 Jury Trial Demanded DECLARATION OF PHILLIP AURENTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING REEXAMINATION OF THE '120 PATENT I, Phillip Aurentz, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. I submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the truth of each statement herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 2240. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 2258.01. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the PTO Action Granting The Second Reexamination of the' 120 Patent. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 2283. Dallas 320822v I Dockets.Justia.com 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the Second Request For Reexamination of the' 120 Patent. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STATE OF TEXAS THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Dated: March 29,2011 Dallas 320822vl

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?