Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 674

REPLY to Response to Motion re #587 SEALED PATENT MOTION IN LIMINE filed by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Phillip Aurentz, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Cawley, Douglas)

Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Doc. 674 Att. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff,

v.
SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
et al.

Defendants.

§ § § § § § § § § § §

CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269
Jury Trial Demanded

DECLARATION OF PHILLIP AURENTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION IN LIMINE
REGARDING REEXAMINATION OF THE '120 PATENT

I, Phillip Aurentz, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of McKool Smith P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. I submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the truth of each statement herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 2240. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 2258.01. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the PTO Action Granting The Second Reexamination of the' 120 Patent. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 2283.

Dallas 320822v I

Dockets.Justia.com

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the Second Request For Reexamination of the' 120 Patent.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STATE OF TEXAS THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Dated: March 29,2011

Dallas 320822vl