Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
701
3rd Amended Trial Witness List Witness List by Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B - 3rd Amended Trial Witness LIst)(Jones, Michael)
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Doc. 701
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 6:09CV00269 Hon. Leonard E. Davis
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
GOOGLE'S NOTICE OF THIRD AMENDED TRIAL WITNESS LIST Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") respectfully submits the attached Third Amended Trial Witness List in place of the list that was attached as Exhibit B to the Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order for Google (Dkt. 578). Dated: April 4, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 Allen Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 Patrick C. Clutter State Bar No. 24036374 Potter Minton, P.C. 110 N. College Ave., Ste. 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel: (903) 597-8311 Fax: (903) 593-0846 mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com patrickclutter@potterminton.com
{A07\7713\0011\W0467209.1 }
Dockets.Justia.com
Claude M. Stern claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Evette D. Pennypacker evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com Todd M. Briggs toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650/801-5002 Fax: 650-801-5100 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 4, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. mail on this same date.
/s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones
{A07\7713\0011\W0467209.1 }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?