Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 723

Proposed Jury Instructions by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Cawley, Douglas)

EXHIBIT B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

BEDROCK COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-269-LED

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR FIRST TRIAL
In answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given you in
the Court’s Charge.
1.

Did Bedrock prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringed the
following claims of the ’120 patent?
Answer “Yes” or “No” for each Claim.
Claims
Claim 1

__________

Claim 2

__________

If you answered “Yes” on any Claim, answer the next question. If not, skip it.

Dallas 321279v2

2.

Did Google prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the listed claims of the
’120 patent are invalid?
If you find the Claim invalid, answer “Yes,” otherwise, answer “No.”

Claim 1

__________

Claim 2

__________

If you have found any claim infringed and valid, answer question 3; otherwise, do
not answer question 3.

3.

What sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence
would fairly and reasonably compensate Bedrock for Google’s infringement of the ’120
patent through the time of trial?

Answer in dollars and cents.

$_________________________________

Signed this _____ day of April, 2011.

___________________________________________
JURY FOREPERSON

Dallas 321279v2

2