Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Proposed Jury Instructions by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Cawley, Douglas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CASE NO. 6:09-CV-269-LED
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR FIRST TRIAL
In answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given you in
the Court’s Charge.
Did Bedrock prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringed the
following claims of the ’120 patent?
Answer “Yes” or “No” for each Claim.
If you answered “Yes” on any Claim, answer the next question. If not, skip it.
Did Google prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the listed claims of the
’120 patent are invalid?
If you find the Claim invalid, answer “Yes,” otherwise, answer “No.”
If you have found any claim infringed and valid, answer question 3; otherwise, do
not answer question 3.
What sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence
would fairly and reasonably compensate Bedrock for Google’s infringement of the ’120
patent through the time of trial?
Answer in dollars and cents.
Signed this _____ day of April, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?