Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 723

Proposed Jury Instructions by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-CV-269-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR FIRST TRIAL In answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given you in the Court’s Charge. 1. Did Bedrock prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringed the following claims of the ’120 patent? Answer “Yes” or “No” for each Claim. Claims Claim 1 __________ Claim 2 __________ If you answered “Yes” on any Claim, answer the next question. If not, skip it. Dallas 321279v2 2. Did Google prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the listed claims of the ’120 patent are invalid? If you find the Claim invalid, answer “Yes,” otherwise, answer “No.” Claim 1 __________ Claim 2 __________ If you have found any claim infringed and valid, answer question 3; otherwise, do not answer question 3. 3. What sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Bedrock for Google’s infringement of the ’120 patent through the time of trial? Answer in dollars and cents. $_________________________________ Signed this _____ day of April, 2011. ___________________________________________ JURY FOREPERSON Dallas 321279v2 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?