Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 751

RESPONSE in Opposition re #722 Joint SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE 120 PATENT (DKT. NO. 659)Joint SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE 120 PATENT (DKT. NO. 659)Joint SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE 120 PATENT (DKT. NO. 659) filed by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cawley, Douglas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED Jury Trial Demanded ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’120 PATENT (DKT. NO. 659) Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration and Objections to Report and Recommendation Denying Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’120 Patent. Dkt. No. 722. Upon careful review and consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED. Dallas 322170v1 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?