Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 763

RESPONSE in Opposition re #756 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO PRECLUDE RELIANCE ON DOCUMENTS AND FACTS RELATED TO PERFORMANCE TESTING PRODUCED BY YAHOO AND SOFTLAYER AFTER CLOSE OF DISCOVERY filed by Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of B. James, #2 Exhibit 1)(Chaikovsky, Yar)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 6:09-cv-269 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED The Honorable Leonard E. Davis DECLARATION OF BRYAN K. JAMES IN SUPPORT OF YAHOO!’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO BEDROCK’S MOTION TO PRECLUDE RELIANCE ON DOCUMENTS AND FACTS RELATED TO PERFORMANCE TESTING PRODUCED BY YAHOO! AFTER CLOSE OF DISCOVERY I, Bryan K. James, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in good standing with the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery, counsel of record for Defendant Yahoo! Inc. I am over eighteen years of age, of sound mind, and am competent in all respects to make this declaration. Unless otherwise stated, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and if called as a witness, could testify competently to such facts under oath. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a portion of the transcripts from the February 10, 2011 deposition of Dr. Mark Jones. Per 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 24, 2011 at Tyler, Texas. /s/ Bryan K. James____________________ Bryan K. James California State Bar No. 260753 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: 650.815.7400 Fax: 650.815.7401 E-mail: bjames@mwe.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Yahoo! Inc. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?