Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 868

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #845 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (Renewed) (Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File A Reply and Surreply to Yahoo!'s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity) by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC, Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Doan, Jennifer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, PLAINTIFF VS. YAHOO!, INC., DEFENDANT § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-269-LED-JDL § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § ORDER Before the Court is a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply and Surreply to Yahoo!’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity filed by Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC (“Bedrock”) and Defendant Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo!”). The Court, having reviewed the motion, and being well-advised, finds that the agreed motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Yahoo! is granted an extension of time through and including July 12, 2011, to file a reply in support of its Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity and Bedrock is granted an extension of time through and including July 18, 2011 to file a surreply. SO ORDERED. ORDER – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?