Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 157

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART filed by Aloft Media, LLC, Halliburton Co., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Fair Isaac Corporation, (JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Williams, Danny)

Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 P.R. 4-3 Joint Statement, Aloft Exhibit A EXHIBIT A U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,499,898; 7,593,910 Patent No(s):Claim(s) Claim Term Proposed Construction Intrinsic Evidence1

`898:14

decision logic

operations to execute a decision `898 Patent: process Figures 1, 1a, 9, 11-18; Abstract; 2:7-14; 3:16-4:3; 17:13-28, 37-54, 58-63; 18:1-16, 17-67; 19:14-15, 24-28, 57-59, 60-62; 22:14-16. No construction necessary. evaluating alternatives in course of a decision process the `898 Patent: Figures 1-9, 11-18; 1:17-19, 23-67; 3:53-4:3; 20:42-44; 13:31-34; 14:14-15:58; 15:21- 40. `910 Patent: 1:11-30; 19:51-53; 22:38-58; 25:79; 27:66-67; 28:1-18; 32:52-53; 34:42-44.

`898:14

capable of performing decision logic

`898: 46 `910:110

decision making

`910:110 `910:110
Dockets.Justia.com

logic related to decision making capable of performing logic related to decision making

No construction necessary. No construction necessary.

Aloft's constructions are based on the intrinsic record of the patents-in-suit, and extrinsic evidence is therefore not necessary to properly construe the terms at issue in this case.

1

Doc. 157 Att. 1

1

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 P.R. 4-3 Joint Statement, Aloft Exhibit A U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,499,898; 7,593,910 Patent No(s):Claim(s) Claim Term Proposed Construction Intrinsic Evidence1

a strategy resulting from a `898 Patent: combination of parameters from Figures 6a, 7; 12:52-55; 12:66 ­ two or more alternative strategies 13:15; 14:5-11; 18:1-16; 18:2119:8; 20:4-21, 59-67; 22:8-12. `898:14, 63 `910:110, 209 potential feasible hybrid theme `910 Patent: 17:11-30; 18:28-45; 20:47-49, 6567; 21:1-10, 14-16; 22:7-11, 15-20, 40-58; 23:50-67; 26:6-8, 24-36, 27:35-39, 43-48; 28:1-18; 29:5-19; 31:14-15, 27-29, 30-36; 32:25-29, 32-36. a display that indicates the `898 Patent: precedence of parameters in a Figure 3, 3a, 4, 8a, 29, 30; 1:23-49; decision process 10:42-51; 11:6-7; 11:48-51; 13:3134, 46-48; 16:65 ­ 17:4; 17:55-63; 18:57-19:8; 20:4-21, 39-44; 22:812. `898:14, 45, 63 `910:110, 157, 159, 209 decision hierarchy display `910 Patent: 17:11-30; 18:28-45; 19:48-56; 20:14-22; 21:51-55; 22:7-11, 1520, 40-58; 23:50-67; 25:4-12, 3947; 27:12-16, 35-39, 43-48; 28:118; 29:5-19; 30:17-25, 50-58; 328-11, 25-29, 32-36, 64-67; 33:1-6, 34-53; 34:34-37.

2

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 P.R. 4-3 Joint Statement, Aloft Exhibit A U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,499,898; 7,593,910 Patent No(s):Claim(s) `898:14 `898:14 Claim Term per the application computer code for processing Proposed Construction No construction necessary. No construction necessary. a reusable software component for `898 Patent: carrying out certain functionality Figures 1, 1a, 2, 3-7, 9, 11-18; 4:52-59, 63-66; 6:12-16, 18-23; 17:29-33; 19:9-13, 29-33, 39-56. `910 Patent: 17:31-35, 52-56, 62-67; 18:1-12; 22:59-63; 23:11-34; 28:19-22, 3740, 45-60. computing environment that facilitates decision processes for different purposes by retrieving and receiving information from different sources and processing the information `898 Patent: Figures 1-9, 11-18; Abstract; 1:1719, 57-62; 3:26-33; 10:21-23, 3225; 15:22-26; 19:26-28. `910 Patent: 17:49-51; 23:8-10; 28:35-36. `898:35 `910:129 `898:42-44 `910:139-41, 176-77 assessing uncertainties No construction necessary. Intrinsic Evidence1

`898:15 `910:111, 118-21

universal modules

`898:22 `910:117

collaborative decision platform

value

No construction necessary.

3

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-304 P.R. 4-3 Joint Statement, Aloft Exhibit A U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,499,898; 7,593,910 Patent No(s):Claim(s) `898:42-44 `910:140-41, 177 Claim Term Proposed Construction No construction necessary. Intrinsic Evidence1

sources of value

4