Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 88

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 43 Amended Complaint, Or Otherwise Respond by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., E-Trade Securities, LLC, Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, TD Ameritrade, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Race, Deborah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC VS. ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-304 JURY DEMANDED ORDER Before the Court is the unopposed motion of Defendants Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, E-Trade Securities, LLC and TD Ameritrade, Inc. seeking an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement in the above-referenced cause until May 7, 2010. After considering the motion, and that Plaintiff has agreed to the extension, the Court finds that it is well taken and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, E-Trade Securities, LLC and TD Ameritrade, Inc. shall have until and including May 7, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?