Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1054

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File A CORRECTED ANSWER by The Go Daddy Group, Inc.. (Mukherji, Proshanto) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2011: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (mjc, ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND THE
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-446 LED

Plaintiffs,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.

DEFENDANT GO DADDY’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A CORRECTED ANSWER
On October 11, 2011, Defendant The Go Daddy Group, Inc. filed (D.I. 1012) its Answer
and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (“Go
Daddy’s Answer”). As a result of a technical error, the numeral “2” appeared in place of the
numeral “3” at a number of places in Go Daddy’s Answer. Go Daddy therefore moves for leave
to file a corrected Answer to correct this error (and not to make any substantive changes to Go
Daddy’s Answer). Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion.

Dated: October 26, 2011.

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Proshanto Mukherji
Thomas M. Melsheimer (Bar No.
13922550)
<[e-mail]>
Neil J. McNabnay (Bar No. 24002583)
<[e-mail]>
Carl E. Bruce (Bar No. 24036278)
<[e-mail]>
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Proshanto Mukherji (pro hac vice)
<[e-mail]>
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
One Marina Park Drive
Boston, MA 02110-1878
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant The Go Daddy Group,
Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Undersigned counsel for Go Daddy conferred by email with counsel for Plaintiffs on
October 26, 2011 regarding this motion. Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion.
/s/ Proshanto Mukherji
Proshanto Mukherji

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have
consented to electronic services pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A), on October 26, 2011.
/s/ Proshanto Mukherji
Proshanto Mukherji

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND THE
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiffs,

Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-446 LED
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GO DADDY’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A CORRECTED ANSWER
The Court, having considered Defendant Go Daddy’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
a Corrected Answer finds good cause having been shown, the motion is meritorious and should be
GRANTED.