Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1056

Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order by Frito-Lay, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McSwane, Douglas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER WITH RESPECT TO EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FRITO-LAY, INC. The Court, having considered Defendant Frito-Lay, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Docket Control Order With Respect to Eolas Technologies, Inc. and Frito-Lay, Inc. Only (“Motion”), finds that the Motion meritorious and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadlines for fact discovery cutoff, the parties’ opening expert reports, and rebuttal expert reports are amended as set forth below: Eolas v. Frito-Lay Only Event Current Deadline (Dkt. 979) November 9, 2011 Amended Deadlines November 18, 2011 Parties with burden of proof designate expert, expert reports due (as to Eolas v. Frito-Lay only) November 16, 2011 November 29, 2011 Rebuttal expert reports and identify rebuttal trial witnesses (as to Eolas v. Frito-Lay only) December 16, 2011 December 19, 2011 Fact discovery cutoff (as to Eolas v. Frito-Lay only)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?