Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1126

RESPONSE in Opposition re 1118 Opposed MOTION for Discovery Motion for Leave to Serve Discovery on Apple, Inc., Patrick Heynen and Los Alamos National Laboratory filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § JURY TRIAL Apple Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments § Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Serve Discovery on Apple, Inc., Patrick Heynen and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Having considered the Motion and the Response thereto, the Court is of the opinion: _______ that the Motion should be GRANTED as to the discovery sought to authenticate [LANL92] and [LANL 93] and DENIED as to the remaining relief sought by Defendants. [or] _______ that the Motion should be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs are also granted leave to serve on Apple, Inc. the subpoena, a copy of which appears as Exhibit 3 to Plaintiffs’ Response. McKool 404629v1 SO ORDERED. McKool 404629v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?