Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1126

RESPONSE in Opposition re 1118 Opposed MOTION for Discovery Motion for Leave to Serve Discovery on Apple, Inc., Patrick Heynen and Los Alamos National Laboratory filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446
§
§
vs.
§
§
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
§
JURY TRIAL
Apple Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
§
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
§
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
§
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
§
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
§
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
§
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
§
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
§
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments
§
Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
§
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Serve Discovery on Apple, Inc.,
Patrick Heynen and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Having considered the Motion and the
Response thereto, the Court is of the opinion:
_______

that the Motion should be GRANTED as to the discovery sought to
authenticate [LANL92] and [LANL 93] and DENIED as to the remaining
relief sought by Defendants.
[or]

_______

that the Motion should be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs are also granted
leave to serve on Apple, Inc. the subpoena, a copy of which appears as
Exhibit 3 to Plaintiffs’ Response.

McKool 404629v1

SO ORDERED.

McKool 404629v1