Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1129
Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 979 Order Motion to Revise Schedule for Briefing of Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc., CDW Corporation, Citigroup Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Staples, Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al.,
DEFENDANTS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-446-LED
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
After full consideration of the Unopposed Motion to Revise Schedule for Briefing of
Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions, the Court has determined that the Motion should be
GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following deadlines are now in place:
Event
Motions to Strike and
Dauberts limited to
amended invalidity
contentions and expert
reports, rebuttal expert
reports, supplemental
expert reports and
Citigroup damages expert
report
Existing Deadline
December 8, 2011
New Deadline
December 22, 2011
Oppositions to Motions
to Strike and Daubert
Motions re: amended
invalidity contentions
and expert reports,
rebuttal expert reports,
supplemental expert
reports and Citigroup
damages expert report
Replies in Support of
Motions to Strike and
Daubert Motions re:
amended invalidity
contentions and expert
reports, rebuttal expert
reports, supplemental
expert reports and
Citigroup damages expert
report
Surreplies in Support of
Oppositions to Motions
to Strike and Daubert
Motions re: amended
invalidity contentions
and expert reports,
rebuttal expert reports,
supplemental expert
reports and Citigroup
damages expert report
December 22, 2011
January 6, 2012
January 6, 2012
January 13, 2012
January 13, 2012
January 20, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?