Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1129

Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 979 Order Motion to Revise Schedule for Briefing of Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc., CDW Corporation, Citigroup Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Staples, Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., et al., DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-446-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER After full consideration of the Unopposed Motion to Revise Schedule for Briefing of Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions, the Court has determined that the Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following deadlines are now in place: Event Motions to Strike and Dauberts limited to amended invalidity contentions and expert reports, rebuttal expert reports, supplemental expert reports and Citigroup damages expert report Existing Deadline December 8, 2011 New Deadline December 22, 2011 Oppositions to Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions re: amended invalidity contentions and expert reports, rebuttal expert reports, supplemental expert reports and Citigroup damages expert report Replies in Support of Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions re: amended invalidity contentions and expert reports, rebuttal expert reports, supplemental expert reports and Citigroup damages expert report Surreplies in Support of Oppositions to Motions to Strike and Daubert Motions re: amended invalidity contentions and expert reports, rebuttal expert reports, supplemental expert reports and Citigroup damages expert report December 22, 2011 January 6, 2012 January 6, 2012 January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012 January 20, 2012 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?