Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1192

***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Opposed MOTION in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs' Suggestion, Argument or Evidence That CDW Could Completely Remove or Disable Accused Features at Minimal Cost by CDW Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Labbe, John) Modified on 1/9/2012 (mjc, ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple
)
Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc.,
)
CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, )
Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. )
Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
)
New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc.,
)
Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises
)
International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples,
)
Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments
)
Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,

Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446

Honorable Judge Leonard E. Davis

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CDW LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE
TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ SUGGESTION, ARGUMENT OR EVIDENCE
THAT CDW COULD COMPLETELY REMOVE OR DISABLE
ACCUSED FEATURES AT MINIMAL COST
The Court having considered Defendant CDW LLC’s Motion in Limine hereby
GRANTS the Motion and orders that the following evidence is excluded:
Plaintiffs’ suggestion, argument or evidence that CDW could completely remove or
disable accused features at minimal cost.
SO ORDERED.