Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1202

Opposed MOTION in Limine CORRECTED - to Exclude Plaintiffs' Suggestion, Argument or Evidence That CDW Could Completely Remove or Disable Accused Features at Minimal Cost by CDW Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Labbe, John)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple ) Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., ) CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, ) Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. ) Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., ) New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., ) Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises ) International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, ) Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments ) Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and YouTube, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 Honorable Judge Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CDW LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ SUGGESTION, ARGUMENT OR EVIDENCE THAT CDW COULD COMPLETELY REMOVE OR DISABLE ACCUSED FEATURES AT MINIMAL COST The Court having considered Defendant CDW LLC’s Motion in Limine hereby GRANTS the Motion and orders that the following evidence is excluded: Plaintiffs’ suggestion, argument or evidence that CDW could completely remove or disable accused features at minimal cost rather than incur the costs of defending against Plaintiffs’ infringement allegations. This Order is not intended to preclude evidence concerning non-infringing alternatives. SO ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?