Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1234

RESPONSE in Opposition re 1202 Opposed MOTION in Limine CORRECTED - to Exclude Plaintiffs' Suggestion, Argument or Evidence That CDW Could Completely Remove or Disable Accused Features at Minimal Cost filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CDW LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE
TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ SUGGESTION, ARGUMENT OR EVIDENCE
THAT CDW COULD COMPLETELY REMOVE OR DISABLE ACCUSED
FEATURES AT MINIMAL COST [DKT. NO. 1202]
The Court, having considered the parties’ briefing and argument regarding Defendant
CDW LLC’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Suggestion, Argument or Evidence that
CDW Could Completely Remove or Disable Accused Features at Minimal Cost [Dkt. No. 1202],
finds that the Motion in Limine should be denied. It is, therefore, hereby ordered that CDW
LLC’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Suggestion, Argument or Evidence that CDW
Could Completely Remove or Disable Accused Features at Minimal Cost is denied.

McKool 406788v1