Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1276

RESPONSE in Opposition re 1273 SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE REGARDING THE INVALIDITY TRIAL filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

ORDER
The Court, having considered the parties’ briefing and argument regarding Defendants’
Supplemental Motions in Limine Regarding the Invalidity Trial [Dkt. No. 1273], finds that
supplemental limine numbers 1 and 2 should be denied and that supplemental limine number 3
should be granted, in part.
It is, therefore, hereby ordered that supplemental limine numbers 1 and 2 in Defendants’
Supplemental Motions in Limine Regarding the Invalidity Trial are denied and supplemental
limine number 3 is granted, in part. The parties are precluded from presenting any argument,
evidence, testimony, or making reference to prior litigation that involves any party or counsel
currently involved in this case except for impeachment purposes.

McKool 407759v1