Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1316

Proposed Jury Instructions by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(McKool, Mike)

EXHIBIT C

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED and
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM
INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP
INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.,
GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC.,
YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00446-LED

JURY TRIAL

PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR INVALIDITY TRIAL

1.

Did Defendants prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following asserted
claims of the ’985 Patent and ’906 Patent are invalid?
Answer “Yes” or “No” for each listed claim.
Patent ’985
Claim 1
Claim 3

__________

Claim 10

__________

Claim 16

McKool 408685v1

__________

__________

1

Claim 18

__________

Claim 20

__________

Claim 22

__________

Claim 36

__________

Claim 38

__________

Claim 40

__________

Claim 42

__________

Patent ’906
Claim 1
Claim 6

McKool 408685v1

__________
__________

2